Home | Feedback | Contact Us
REFERENCES  
  1. William W. Park, Non-Signatories and International Arbitration at http://www.williamwpark.com/documents/Non-signatories.pdf

  2. 3 Clint A. Corrie, Challenges in International Arbitration for Non-Signatories, in COMPARATIVE LAW YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, 45 (Kluwer Law International, 2007).

  3. Société V 2000 v. Société Project XJ 220ITD & autre, (1996) 2 Rev. Arb. 245.

  4. Park, supra note 1, at 29.

  5. Id. at 30.

  6. Dow Chemical v. Isover St. Gobain, (1983) J. Dr. Int’l 899.

  7. Id.

  8. Id.

  9. Zuberbühler, Non-Signatories and the Consensus to Arbitrate, 26(1) ASA BULLETIN 25, 26 (2008).

  10. A v. B & C., (2005) 3 ASA Bull. 496.

  11. Dow Chemical, supra note 6.

  12. John Savage and Tan Ai Leen, Family Ties: When Arbitration Agreements Bind Non-signatory Affiliate Companies, ASIAN DISPUTE REVIEW, 16, 17 (2003).

  13. 404 F.3d 657 (2d Cir. 2005).

  14. Peterson Farms Inc. v. C&M Farming Ltd,. (2004) EWHC 121.

  15. Id.

  16. Heytesbury Holdings Pty Ltd v. City of Subiaco, (1998) 19 WAR 440 (SCWA).

  17. Supra note 10.

  18. Decision of 27 April, 2010 in Civil Appeal No. 3874 of 2010, (visited Aug. 30, 2010), at http://indiankanoon.org/doc/997909/

  19. Philipp Habegger, Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Non-signatories and Requirements of Form, 22(2) ASA BULLETIN 398, 399 (2004).

  20. Yves Derains, L'extension de la clause d'arbitrage aux non-signatories - la doctrine des groupes de sociétés, 8 ASA SPECIAL SERIES 241 (1994).

  21. Otto Sandrock, Arbitration Agreements and Groups of Companies, Etudes Pierre Lalive, 625 (1993).

  22. Thomson-CSF, SA v. Am. Arbitration Association, 64 F.3d 777 (2d Cir., 1995).

  23. Estate of Lisle v. Commissioner, 341 F.3d 364, 375–76, (5th Cir., 2003).

  24. MAG Portfolio Consultant, GMBH v. Merlin Biomed Group LLC, 268 F.3d 58, 63 (2d Cir., 2001).

    25. It reads: “If a third party requests to join a pending arbitration or if one of the parties to the arbitration seeks a third party's intervention, the Arbitral Tribunal shall decide the application after consulting the parties, taking into consideration all the relevant circumstances ofs the case.”

  25. Supranote 2, at 57.

  26. Estate of Lisle, supra note 24.

  27. (1992) 2 ASA Bull 202.

  28. Oxford Capital Corp. v. United States, 211 F.3d 280, 284 (5th Cir., 2000).

  29. American Fuel Corp. v. Utah Energy Dev. Co, 122 F.3d 134 (2d Cir., 1997).

  30. Restatement (Second) of Agency, § 1(1), (1958).

  31. Hester Intern. Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 879 F.2d 170, 181 (5th Cir., 1989).

  32. Robert M. Nelson, How to Bind Non-Signatories to an Arbitration Clause, 18 (visited Aug. 16, 2010) at www.nelsonadr.ca/media.php?mid=14

  33. China National Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corporation v. Loebersdorfer Maschinenfabrik AG (Austria), (1996) 4 ASA Bull 623, 629.

  34. 64 F.3d 777 (2d Cir., 1995)

  35. Westmoreland v. Sadoux, 299 F.3d 466 (5th Cir., 2002).

  36. Racicky v. Farmland Indus. Inc., 328 F.3d 389, 393 (8th Cir., 2003).

  37. Andreas Reiner, The Form of the Agent's Power to sign an Arbitration Agreement and Art.II(2) of the New York Convention, 9 ICCA CONGRESS SERIES, 82 (1999).

  38. ICC Case No. 5832 of 1988, (1988) 115 J. D. Int’l 1198.

  39. On Austrian law see s.1008 of the Austrian Civil Code and on Swiss law see Art.396(3) of the Swiss Federal Code of Obligations

  40. Rocco Giuseppe e Fli v. Federal Commerce and Navigation Ltd., (1985) 10 YBCA 464.

  41. Total v. Achille Lauro, (1977) 17 Rassegna dell’Arbitrato 94, 95.

  42. (1968) Arbitrale Rechtspraak 138, 140 (Landesgericht Hamburg).

  43. Otto Sandrock, The Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Non-Signatories: An Enigma Still Unresolved, in CORPORATIONS, CAPITAL MARKETS AND BUSINESS IN THE LAW 467 (Theodor Baums et al. eds, Liber Amicorum Richard M. Buxbaum, 2000), 467.

  44. Supra note 9, at 22.

  45. J. BRIAN CASEY, ARBITRATION LAW OF CANADA: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE, HUNTINGTON, JURIS PUBLISHING INC., 59 (2005).

  46. Supra note 32, at 30.

  47. Supra note 45, at 60.

  48. Nanisivik Mines Ltd. v. F.C.R.S. Shipping Ltd. (1994) 113 D.L.R. (4th) 536 (F.C.A.).

  49. Continental U.K. Ltd. v. Anagel Confidence Compania Naviera, S.A., 658 F. Supp. 809 (S.D.N.Y. 1987).

  50. Import Export Steel Corp. v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co., 351 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1965).

  51. International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlangen GMBH, 206 F. 3d 411 (4CA 2000).

  52. Charles Lee Eisen, What Arbitration Agreement? Compelling Non-Signatories to Arbitrate, 56(2) Disp. R. J. 40 (2001) at 44.

  53. Deloitte Noraudit A/S v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, US, 9 F. 3d 1060 (2nd Cir. 1993).

  54. American Bureau of Shipping v. Tencara Shipyard SpA, 170 F. 3d 349 (2nd Cir. 1999).

  55. Astra Oil Company, Inc. v. Rover Navigation, Ltd., F. 3rd (2nd Cir. 2003).

  56. 177 F. 3d 942, 947 (11th Cir. 1999).

  57. Thomson-CSF, SA v. American Arbitration Association, 64 F. 3d 773 (2nd Cir. 1995).

  58. 10 F. 3d 753, 757 (11th Cir. 1993).

  59. Id.

  60. 741 F.2d 342, 344 (11th Cir., 1984)

  61. Frank Z. LaForge, Inequitable Estoppel: Arbitrating with Nonsignatory Defendants Under Grigson v Creative Artists, 84 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 225, 241 (2005).

  62. Id. at 246.

  63. James M. Hosking, The Third Party Non-Signatory’s Ability to Compel International Commercial Arbitration: Doing Justice without Destroying Consent, 4 PEPPERDINE DISP. R. L. J. 469, 489 (2004).

  64. Id. at 489

  65. Id

  66. Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter et al, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Fourth Edition, London, 2004 at 179.

  67. Supra note 63, at 484.

  68. Id

  69. SMABTP v. Statinor, (1997) Revue de l'Arbitrage 550, 552 (Cour d'Appel, Paris).

  70. Ms Emja Braack Shiffahrts KG v. Wärtsilä Diesel AB, (1998) Revue de l'Arbitrage 431, 433.

  71. Supra note 2, at 64

  72. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Gaskamp, 280 F.3d 1069, 1075–76 (5th Cir., 2002).

  73. Id.

  74. Industrial Electronics Corp. of Wisconsin v. iPower Distribution Group, Inc., 215 F.3d 677 (7th Cir., 2000).

  75. (1992) 3 S.C.R. 299.

  76. 175 F. Supp. 2d 894 (S.D. Miss. 2001).

  77. Ross Brothers Constr. Co., Inc. v. International Steel Services Inc., 283 F. 3d 867 (7th Cir. 2002).

  78. UNCITRAL Secretariat, Settlement of Commercial Disputes: Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, A/CN.9/W.G.II/WP.143, Vienna, 20 July 2006, see § 70 -71.
 
© 2007 India Law Journal   Permission and Rights | Disclaimer